Rašyti komentarą...
Nuoroda nukopijuota
× Pranešti klaidą
2 февраля 2010 г. (LPAC) – «Система евро рушится», – прокомментировал американский экономист Линдон Ларуш стратегическую важность финансового и политического кризиса, поразившего Грецию, Испанию, Ирландию и другие страны ЕС. Ларуш предупредил: «Нужно беспокоиться не о «греческом кризисе», следует думать о разрушении системы евро».
«Кризис евро, – продолжал Ларуш, – сильно ударит по Великобритании и Бразилии, и в то же время по Испании и другим странам. Это уже происходит. Случай Греции – это незначительное сопутствующее обстоятельство. Может начаться цепная реакция крушения системы евро».
Причина в ключевом положении банка Сантандер. Сантандер номинально испанский банк, но его контролирует Королевский банк Шотландии, обслуживающий королевскую семью Великобритании. «Так что реально, – сказал Ларуш, – в Испании разворачивается английский кризис». Фантастический рост Сантандера в последние годы привел к тому, что он стал крупнейшим банком в еврозоне – недавно он обогнал Гонконгскую и шанхайскую банковскую корпорацию (HSBC). Этот банк стал девятым крупнейшим банком мира по рыночной капитализации. Это также крупнейшая банковская группа в Латинской Америке, ему принадлежит около 10% всех банковских активов в регионе, т. е., он доминирует в регионе, где главная экономическая деятельность – наркоторговля. В 2007 году Сантандер также занял ключевое положение в лакомом кусочке – бразильской банковской системе.
В свете этого, заметил Ларуш, можно задуматься о мудрости и побуждениях тех в России и других странах, кто обратил взор на Европу и Бразилию, рассматривая их в качестве альтернативы доллару – как раз тогда, когда они уходят в небытие.
«Кризис евро, – продолжал Ларуш, – сильно ударит по Великобритании и Бразилии, и в то же время по Испании и другим странам. Это уже происходит. Случай Греции – это незначительное сопутствующее обстоятельство. Может начаться цепная реакция крушения системы евро».
Причина в ключевом положении банка Сантандер. Сантандер номинально испанский банк, но его контролирует Королевский банк Шотландии, обслуживающий королевскую семью Великобритании. «Так что реально, – сказал Ларуш, – в Испании разворачивается английский кризис». Фантастический рост Сантандера в последние годы привел к тому, что он стал крупнейшим банком в еврозоне – недавно он обогнал Гонконгскую и шанхайскую банковскую корпорацию (HSBC). Этот банк стал девятым крупнейшим банком мира по рыночной капитализации. Это также крупнейшая банковская группа в Латинской Америке, ему принадлежит около 10% всех банковских активов в регионе, т. е., он доминирует в регионе, где главная экономическая деятельность – наркоторговля. В 2007 году Сантандер также занял ключевое положение в лакомом кусочке – бразильской банковской системе.
В свете этого, заметил Ларуш, можно задуматься о мудрости и побуждениях тех в России и других странах, кто обратил взор на Европу и Бразилию, рассматривая их в качестве альтернативы доллару – как раз тогда, когда они уходят в небытие.
Only One Solution: Glass-Steagall
Whereas Euroskeptics ran the risk, until recently, of being burned at the stake of the free-market economy, it is no longer possible now to quash the debate on the euro as a failed construction. For example, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Germany leading financial daily, reported on the pro and con controversy within its own editorial board, under the title "Should the Euro Be Scrapped?" in its Feb. 21 edition. "Greece would also be better off today without the euro," it writes. "It has now been demonstrated that the introduction of the euro was a grave mistake. What no one wanted to hear from the critics, can now be seen in reality: A monetary union without [economic] policy integration is a bad thing. The main point is that the introduction of the euro took away the possibility of buffering economic difficulties with fluctuating exchange rates."
Now the trend of the gang of bandits is towards a European economic government (why on Earth would finance ministers or heads of government suddenly become wiser collectively, than they are individually?), or else to assign the world government to the IMF, in order to push through a really brutal austerity policy. Have these dilettantes really learned nothing from the mistakes of Brüning?[1]
The only reasonable solution is to immediately implement the Glass-Steagall standard in Europe, and with as many partner countries as possible in the world. The next step must be to make public credit available for industry and agriculture, and to maintain or begin production of real goods. Gambling debts are a problem for those who have produced them, not for us taxpayers. A sustainable budget is one which prevents organized crime (viz., the dinner in Manhattan) from stealing old people's pensions.
A sign of hope is that Chancellor Merkel is finally worried about the euro. In that case, she should fire Asmussen, allow an open debate on the motivations behind the climate change swindle, and let experts explain to her what Germany would look like as an industrial nation with solar and wind energy. She's a physicist, after all, isn't she?
Whereas Euroskeptics ran the risk, until recently, of being burned at the stake of the free-market economy, it is no longer possible now to quash the debate on the euro as a failed construction. For example, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Germany leading financial daily, reported on the pro and con controversy within its own editorial board, under the title "Should the Euro Be Scrapped?" in its Feb. 21 edition. "Greece would also be better off today without the euro," it writes. "It has now been demonstrated that the introduction of the euro was a grave mistake. What no one wanted to hear from the critics, can now be seen in reality: A monetary union without [economic] policy integration is a bad thing. The main point is that the introduction of the euro took away the possibility of buffering economic difficulties with fluctuating exchange rates."
Now the trend of the gang of bandits is towards a European economic government (why on Earth would finance ministers or heads of government suddenly become wiser collectively, than they are individually?), or else to assign the world government to the IMF, in order to push through a really brutal austerity policy. Have these dilettantes really learned nothing from the mistakes of Brüning?[1]
The only reasonable solution is to immediately implement the Glass-Steagall standard in Europe, and with as many partner countries as possible in the world. The next step must be to make public credit available for industry and agriculture, and to maintain or begin production of real goods. Gambling debts are a problem for those who have produced them, not for us taxpayers. A sustainable budget is one which prevents organized crime (viz., the dinner in Manhattan) from stealing old people's pensions.
A sign of hope is that Chancellor Merkel is finally worried about the euro. In that case, she should fire Asmussen, allow an open debate on the motivations behind the climate change swindle, and let experts explain to her what Germany would look like as an industrial nation with solar and wind energy. She's a physicist, after all, isn't she?
medijos melas apie graikiją. Bankrutuoja
At the same time, hedge funds exacerbated the Greek debt crisis by using the credit default swaps (CDS) market to attack the country. According to Greek press reports, the Greek secret service, the EYP, is now investigating the matter. In the meantime, many funds secured their gains and got out of the Greek CDS, to focus on other countries, beginning with Spain.
The Greek population is now supposed to foot the bill. The European Union, the European Central Bank, and the German government (none other than Mr. "True Sale International" Jörg Asmussen—think back to the bandit story) are pressuring the Greek government to put through a draconian austerity package. Harsh cuts in health care and pensions are planned, as well as wage cuts of up to EU300 in the public sector, an increase in the value added tax (VAT) and the gasoline tax, and higher prices for electricity, water, gas, and transportation. Some 40,000 jobs are to be cut in the public sector; the labor market and social security system will be hard hit, and hospitals are supposed to reduce their costs by 30%! At the same time, German banks are refusing to extend more credit. No wonder the Greek population is angry with the EU and Germany, and that some have called for boycotting German goods.
In fact, the media focus on Greece has been completely exaggerated, and deliberately misleading, in order to deflect attention from the fact that the Greek national debt is relatively small. A far bigger problem is the bankruptcy of Great Britain, and the Spanish debt which is connected to that bankruptcy. Jim Rogers, a former business partner of George Soros, described the pound sterling as a "hopeless case" in the Guardian—a weak currency that has already lost value against virtually every currency except the Zimbabwean dollar. The Daily Telegraph had already indicated weeks ago that Great Britain is in a much worse situation than Greece.
The Greek population is now supposed to foot the bill. The European Union, the European Central Bank, and the German government (none other than Mr. "True Sale International" Jörg Asmussen—think back to the bandit story) are pressuring the Greek government to put through a draconian austerity package. Harsh cuts in health care and pensions are planned, as well as wage cuts of up to EU300 in the public sector, an increase in the value added tax (VAT) and the gasoline tax, and higher prices for electricity, water, gas, and transportation. Some 40,000 jobs are to be cut in the public sector; the labor market and social security system will be hard hit, and hospitals are supposed to reduce their costs by 30%! At the same time, German banks are refusing to extend more credit. No wonder the Greek population is angry with the EU and Germany, and that some have called for boycotting German goods.
In fact, the media focus on Greece has been completely exaggerated, and deliberately misleading, in order to deflect attention from the fact that the Greek national debt is relatively small. A far bigger problem is the bankruptcy of Great Britain, and the Spanish debt which is connected to that bankruptcy. Jim Rogers, a former business partner of George Soros, described the pound sterling as a "hopeless case" in the Guardian—a weak currency that has already lost value against virtually every currency except the Zimbabwean dollar. The Daily Telegraph had already indicated weeks ago that Great Britain is in a much worse situation than Greece.
kas tam lietuvos naikintojui dave zodi . kas ta demagogu karaliu isrinko i valdzia vel .? Pas ukininka tik pimeniu ,ir dsertacija atitinka .
Those who invited hedge funds into Germany in 2004, and who are now passively watching those same funds speculate not only against Greece, but on the collapse of the euro, while demanding that the taxpayers cover the losses, and that the citizens tighten their belts, have a striking similarity to that bank director. Germany has truly fallen prey to the bandits.
In order to prevent a chaotic collapse of the euro, with catastrophic consequences for the real economy and living standards, governments in Europe must immediately implement a Glass-Steagall standard, i.e., set up a strict firewall between commercial banks and investment banks. Speculation by financial holding companies, hedge funds, private equity funds, etc., must be totally separated from the savings and lending activities of commercial banks. Should financial institutions engaged in high-risk operations make the wrong bets, they will have to face the music themselves. Taxpayers should no longer be expected to cover the debts of professional gamblers.
Should it prove impossible to establish fixed exchange rates in the short term, we will have to penalize currency speculation immediately. It is unacceptable to have "all-star" managers of the largest hedge funds decide, over a private dinner in Manhattan, to speculate on a collapse of the euro down to a 1:1 parity with the dollar, which would slash, by a quarter or a third, the economic wealth of those people who have the misfortune of living in the Eurozone.
The Federal government is urgently called upon to protect the German people from harm—as their oath of office states—by introducing the Glass-Steagall standard and by prohibiting currency speculation. If Chancellor Merkel, who has apparently noticed for the first time that the euro is in a difficult situation, is really concerned with ensuring a sustainable budget, this is the problem to be eradicated.
In order to prevent a chaotic collapse of the euro, with catastrophic consequences for the real economy and living standards, governments in Europe must immediately implement a Glass-Steagall standard, i.e., set up a strict firewall between commercial banks and investment banks. Speculation by financial holding companies, hedge funds, private equity funds, etc., must be totally separated from the savings and lending activities of commercial banks. Should financial institutions engaged in high-risk operations make the wrong bets, they will have to face the music themselves. Taxpayers should no longer be expected to cover the debts of professional gamblers.
Should it prove impossible to establish fixed exchange rates in the short term, we will have to penalize currency speculation immediately. It is unacceptable to have "all-star" managers of the largest hedge funds decide, over a private dinner in Manhattan, to speculate on a collapse of the euro down to a 1:1 parity with the dollar, which would slash, by a quarter or a third, the economic wealth of those people who have the misfortune of living in the Eurozone.
The Federal government is urgently called upon to protect the German people from harm—as their oath of office states—by introducing the Glass-Steagall standard and by prohibiting currency speculation. If Chancellor Merkel, who has apparently noticed for the first time that the euro is in a difficult situation, is really concerned with ensuring a sustainable budget, this is the problem to be eradicated.
nebuvo Vagnoriui kitos alternatyvos matot... o kaip Lukašenka išsisuko nuo tos vienintelės alternatyvosw?
šiandien turėjo AMB 6 val daryti viešą išpažintį. Kada išpažįs viešai savo nuodėmes Vagnorius?
šiandien turėjo AMB 6 val daryti viešą išpažintį. Kada išpažįs viešai savo nuodėmes Vagnorius?
oligarchu... NERA, reformos labai teisingos... nu gal nejuokinam liaudies...
Kaip tai po stalu? Nuotraukoj aiškiai matyti, kad Vagnorius už stalo, ne po stalu.
Jelcinui taip patiko jam paties parlamento suteiktos galios, kad jis net pasivafdino Borisu I-uoju:)
ir taip suįžulėjo, kad pan aikino net konstituciją ir kad paleidžia parlamentą... O kai parlamentas jam paskelbė apkaltą, taijis apsupo parlamento rūmus kariuomene ir privertė išjunkt elektrą. Rusijos demokratijos rėmėjai, gal milijonas žmonių stengėsi pralaušt blokadą... dvi savaites vyko ta blokada ir tik vėliau buvusiems viduje buvo leista atnešti v andens ior valgio.
O Jelcino poziciją pastiprino JAV iškart paskirta dviejų su puse milijardo parama. rinkos reformoms ir demokratijos užgniaužimui. Ir visas šis erzelis kilo dėl TVF manijakiško nusistatymo biudžeto ir finansų politikos atžvilgiu, neatsižvelgiant į kitus, ypač socialinius reikalus.
O mūsų Vagnoriukas juk toks aklas TVF vergas
ir taip suįžulėjo, kad pan aikino net konstituciją ir kad paleidžia parlamentą... O kai parlamentas jam paskelbė apkaltą, taijis apsupo parlamento rūmus kariuomene ir privertė išjunkt elektrą. Rusijos demokratijos rėmėjai, gal milijonas žmonių stengėsi pralaušt blokadą... dvi savaites vyko ta blokada ir tik vėliau buvusiems viduje buvo leista atnešti v andens ior valgio.
O Jelcino poziciją pastiprino JAV iškart paskirta dviejų su puse milijardo parama. rinkos reformoms ir demokratijos užgniaužimui. Ir visas šis erzelis kilo dėl TVF manijakiško nusistatymo biudžeto ir finansų politikos atžvilgiu, neatsižvelgiant į kitus, ypač socialinius reikalus.
O mūsų Vagnoriukas juk toks aklas TVF vergas
Jelcinas, kaip pamenat, buvo tarsi Garbačiovo antipodas. Gorbis diegė saikingumą ir net agresyviai kovojo prieš degtinės vartojimą, Jelcinas pats buvo žinomas kaip besotis girtuoklis. Savo pergalingą šou, jelcinas nieko nelaukdamas p[avertė politine didelia politine galia. Jis sudarė aljansą su dviem kitom sovietų sąjungos respublikom (aišku kuriom:) ir šis meistriškas žingsnis privedė prie SSSR subyrėjimo, o Gorbį privertė atsistatydinti. Šis subyrėjimas buvo stiprus smūgis rusų dvasiai, pirmas triauminis šokas. O mums buvo teigiama, kad "atgavom laisvę"...
Jeffrey Sachsas buvio Kremliaius salėje tą dieną, kai Jelcinas paskelbė jog sovietų Sąjunga liovėsi egzistavusi. Tačiau Jelcinui ne vien jo patarimo reikėjo, jam reikėjo to "aukso puodo", kurį Sakchas buvo laimėjęs Lenkijai. Sachsas jam pažadėjo 19 milijardų už tai, jei laikysis "didžiojo sprogimo" , bet Jelcinas nežinojo, kad Sachso saulė jau leidosi. Jelcinui reikėjo skubiai rinktis: ar demokratinį požiūrį ir nuosavybę padalinti visiems visuomenės nariams, ar "aparatčikų"" (t.y. kinietišką) požiūrį: t.y. geriausias dalis atiduoti kompartijos vadovams. Jelcinas pasirinko antrąjį požiūrį. O kartu su juo ir Liertuvos Vagnoriukai:)) ir labai paskubomis... Parlamentui jis pateikė pasiūlymą: jei jam vienerius metus bus suteikti ypatingi įgaliojimai, kad galėtų dekretais skelbti įstatymus, užuot teikęs juos parlamentui, jis įveiksiąs ekonominę krizę ir grąžinsiąs sveiką sistemą, vienžo, prašė diktatūrosI Iš dėkingumo (dėl pučo) parlamentas sutiko.
Jeffrey Sachsas buvio Kremliaius salėje tą dieną, kai Jelcinas paskelbė jog sovietų Sąjunga liovėsi egzistavusi. Tačiau Jelcinui ne vien jo patarimo reikėjo, jam reikėjo to "aukso puodo", kurį Sakchas buvo laimėjęs Lenkijai. Sachsas jam pažadėjo 19 milijardų už tai, jei laikysis "didžiojo sprogimo" , bet Jelcinas nežinojo, kad Sachso saulė jau leidosi. Jelcinui reikėjo skubiai rinktis: ar demokratinį požiūrį ir nuosavybę padalinti visiems visuomenės nariams, ar "aparatčikų"" (t.y. kinietišką) požiūrį: t.y. geriausias dalis atiduoti kompartijos vadovams. Jelcinas pasirinko antrąjį požiūrį. O kartu su juo ir Liertuvos Vagnoriukai:)) ir labai paskubomis... Parlamentui jis pateikė pasiūlymą: jei jam vienerius metus bus suteikti ypatingi įgaliojimai, kad galėtų dekretais skelbti įstatymus, užuot teikęs juos parlamentui, jis įveiksiąs ekonominę krizę ir grąžinsiąs sveiką sistemą, vienžo, prašė diktatūrosI Iš dėkingumo (dėl pučo) parlamentas sutiko.
Gediminas Vagnorius: jei oligarchų ir yra, jie veikia po stalu