Rašyti komentarą...
Nuoroda nukopijuota
× Pranešti klaidą
>>O tą kažką vadina Absoliutu, Aukščiausiu Protu, Aukščiausiu Planu ar tiesiog Dievu - kaip kam priimtiniau ir patogiau
O taip pat tai vadinama ir Hyperactive Agency Detection.
Agent detection is the inclination for animals and humans to presume the purposeful intervention of an intelligent agent in situations that may or may not involve an intelligent agent.
O taip pat tai vadinama ir Hyperactive Agency Detection.
Agent detection is the inclination for animals and humans to presume the purposeful intervention of an intelligent agent in situations that may or may not involve an intelligent agent.
@Staska
>>Yra įrodyta, kad tikintys žmonės (kurie tikrai sąmoningai tiki) yra žymiai laimingesni už netikinčius...
Moksliškai tai vadinama išstūmimu. Problemos išstumiamos - jų tarsi nebelieka. Tai toks apsauginis mechanizmas.
O šiaip jau tai yra tuščias teiginys, jeigu nenurodomas tokių žinių šaltinis.
>>Yra įrodyta, kad tikintys žmonės (kurie tikrai sąmoningai tiki) yra žymiai laimingesni už netikinčius...
Moksliškai tai vadinama išstūmimu. Problemos išstumiamos - jų tarsi nebelieka. Tai toks apsauginis mechanizmas.
O šiaip jau tai yra tuščias teiginys, jeigu nenurodomas tokių žinių šaltinis.
kyla tie klausimai. gal turi atsakymu?
girdejai kaip amerikonai papirkineja lietuvisku..tfu.. afganistanietisku genciu lyderius? negi manai, kad ES kitaip? perpirko ta kumelaite is Leningrado kailiu fabriko, dabar ji dirba ES svilpuku gamykleleje. atsakinga uz prezidenturos garsiausiaji Lietuvoj :)
girdejai kaip amerikonai papirkineja lietuvisku..tfu.. afganistanietisku genciu lyderius? negi manai, kad ES kitaip? perpirko ta kumelaite is Leningrado kailiu fabriko, dabar ji dirba ES svilpuku gamykleleje. atsakinga uz prezidenturos garsiausiaji Lietuvoj :)
zinai, cyvai, geras klausimas- puse atsakymo.
tai vistik kaip ten su tuo gylio pamatavimu? turit shkale? :)
tai vistik kaip ten su tuo gylio pamatavimu? turit shkale? :)
Pats ,pats laikas mesti iš valdžios brežnevinių laikų veikėjus - Grybauskaitę ,Kubilių,Landsbergį,etc. - iš tų šiaudų grūdų tikrai nebus...Ir visai ne todėl ,kad esu prieš juos asmeniškai nusistatęs - šie žmonės turi ir nuopelnų ir nuodėmių.Tačiau akivaizdu ,kad jie jau aiški vakarykštė diena ,jie tikrai nebegali dėl daugybės priežasčių nei pateikti ,nei tuo labiau realiai įvykdyti jokių pažangesnių,originalesnių laikmetį atitinkančių sprendimų.Per daug nepatogūs ir kompromituojantys jiems ir minėti klausimai.Ir iš tiesų- jų niekas neturėtų jokios moralinės teisės uždavinėti - tačiau su viena sąlyga - jie neturėtų būti pirmaisiais šalies asmenimis.Todėl ,nors ir labai nemalonu ,kai taip šaipomasi iš šalies Prezidentės ,tačiau turiu pripažinti,kad Čyvas š. atv. yra absoliučiai teisus,tenka tik padėkoti už tokį straipsnį(jokiu būdu nesu absoliutus Čyvo minčių gerbėjas kitais atvejais).
psychotherapy begins with the realization that healing is of the mind, and in psychotherapy those have come together who believe this. It may be they will not get much further, for no-one learns beyond his own readiness. Yet levels of readiness change, and when therapist or patient has reached the next one, there will be a relationship held out to them that meets the changing need. Perhaps they will come together again and advance in the same relationship, making it holier. Or perhaps each of them will enter into another commitment. Be assured of this; each will progress. Retrogression is temporary. The overall direction is one of progress toward the truth.
Formal religion has no place in psychotherapy, but it also has no real place in religion. In this world, there is an astonishing tendency to join contradictory words into one term without perceiving the contradiction at all. The attempt to formalize religion is so obviously an ego attempt to reconcile the irreconcilable that it hardly requires elaboration here. Religion is experience; psychotherapy is experience. At the highest levels they become one. Neither is truth itself, but both can lead to truth. What can be necessary to find truth, which remains perfectly obvious, but to remove the seeming obstacles to true awareness?
Formal religion has no place in psychotherapy, but it also has no real place in religion. In this world, there is an astonishing tendency to join contradictory words into one term without perceiving the contradiction at all. The attempt to formalize religion is so obviously an ego attempt to reconcile the irreconcilable that it hardly requires elaboration here. Religion is experience; psychotherapy is experience. At the highest levels they become one. Neither is truth itself, but both can lead to truth. What can be necessary to find truth, which remains perfectly obvious, but to remove the seeming obstacles to true awareness?
Psychotherapy is the only form of therapy there is. Since only the mind can be sick, only the mind can be healed. Only the mind is in need of healing.
Psychotherapy is a process that changes the view of the self. At best this "new" self is a more beneficent self-concept, but psychotherapy can hardly be expected to establish reality. That is not its function. If it can make way for reality, it has achieved its ultimate success. Its whole function, in the end, is to help the patient deal with one fundamental error; the belief that anger brings him something he really wants, and that by justifying attack he is protecting himself. To whatever extent he comes to realize that this is mistaken, to that extent is he truly saved.
At the beginning, then, the patient's goal and the therapist's are at variance. The therapist as well as the patient may cherish false self-concepts, but their respective perceptions of "improvement" still must differ. The patient hopes to learn how to get the changes he wants without changing his self-concept to any significant extent. He hopes, in fact, to stabilize it sufficiently to include within it the magical powers he seeks in psychotherapy. He wants to make the vulnerable invulnerable and the finite limitless. The self he sees is his god, and he seeks only to serve it better.
Psychotherapy is a process that changes the view of the self. At best this "new" self is a more beneficent self-concept, but psychotherapy can hardly be expected to establish reality. That is not its function. If it can make way for reality, it has achieved its ultimate success. Its whole function, in the end, is to help the patient deal with one fundamental error; the belief that anger brings him something he really wants, and that by justifying attack he is protecting himself. To whatever extent he comes to realize that this is mistaken, to that extent is he truly saved.
At the beginning, then, the patient's goal and the therapist's are at variance. The therapist as well as the patient may cherish false self-concepts, but their respective perceptions of "improvement" still must differ. The patient hopes to learn how to get the changes he wants without changing his self-concept to any significant extent. He hopes, in fact, to stabilize it sufficiently to include within it the magical powers he seeks in psychotherapy. He wants to make the vulnerable invulnerable and the finite limitless. The self he sees is his god, and he seeks only to serve it better.
Sakyk ka nori, raayk ka nori, o tikejimas tikrai ne tavo reiklas. Sitaip isvartyt galima, kad galejai kad ir laikrasciu sikna valyt, kai rasyt mokeis, bet kai pradejai rasyt, dabar jau turi prisipazint, koki tualetini popieriu naudoji. Cia tik tamstos isvartymas.
"labai geri" Čyvo straipsniai nepatinka intelektualams:)) :)) :))
Tomai Čyvai, geresnio komplimento tamstai nesu girdėjęs:)
Tomai Čyvai, geresnio komplimento tamstai nesu girdėjęs:)
prarūgusios sovietinės žurnalistikos atstovui tiesa nerūpi. Jis neturi temų ir mato vienintelę Lietuvos ir pasaulio problema - tai Lietuvos Prezidentę, tautos išrinktą. Jis įžeidinėja tikslingai rinkėjus, bandydamas sukelti diskusiją, kad kuo daugiau komentatorių pamatytų alkoholio reklamą - štai ir visa logika.
Ar prezidentė yra giliai tikinti?