Rašyti komentarą...
Nuoroda nukopijuota
× Pranešti klaidą
Sorošas nėra joks filantropas. Jis dirba išvien su Pasaulio Banku ir Rotschildų familia. (beje, Rotschildas valdo puse Lukoil akcijų:) Taigi, globalistas su tam tikrais tikslais. Ir nebūtinai vien deklaruojama kova prieš totalitarizmą.( Jo mokytojas Popperis bandė įrodyti, kad totalitarizmo šaknys prasideda Platono "Valstybėje", bet tai netiesa. Šaknys žmogaus ego:) Jau 1972 m. laikraštukas Jon Bell Reports, kurį įsteigė iš Vietnamo karo grįžę JAV žurnalistai, rašė, kad nuo 1990 m. abi ekonominės formacijos - komunistinė (socialistinė blogaja prasme:) ir kapitalistinė bus sujungtos į vieną. Juk nesunku buvo atspėti - kurios naudai? Norint įvesti totalitarinę diktatūrą, pasaulinę, kapitalizmas su jo "laisvėm ir teisėm' visiškai netinka. Kisindžeriui, (žr.Wiki, ten rasite ir apie Kisindžerio globotą Mao dze Dungą įdomių detalių) iš visų ekonominių eksperimentų, labiausiai patiko Kinų variantas - su viena valdančia partija, minčių policija (kontroliuojamas net internetas...su "vakarų" pagalba) ir šiokia tokia ekonomine laisve, t.y. atsisakant socialinės atsakomybės. Nepaprastai patogu:)
Taigi, belieka laukti socializmo. Duok Dieve, kad jis būtų "su žmogišku veidu", kaip mėgo kartoti Gorbis. Ir neduok Dieve, jei jis bus totali Didžiojo Brolio diktatūra su naujom technologijom kontroliuojamu lageriu, apie kurį pranašavo Orvell. Tačiau žinant kas jau dabar yra daroma ta linkme - tautų fragmentacija per emigracijos skatinimą, naujoji ideologija su Biblijoje neminimomis nuodėmėmis - "homofobija", Hokausto neigimas", "ksenofobija"... ir t.t. "visuomenių transformavimas"... ir t.t... tai nieko gero nesitiki... bet va Sarkozi, su savo drasiais pareiškimais, teikia vilčių. Drąsus šis safardas. Tikiu gerų jėgų pergale.
Taigi, belieka laukti socializmo. Duok Dieve, kad jis būtų "su žmogišku veidu", kaip mėgo kartoti Gorbis. Ir neduok Dieve, jei jis bus totali Didžiojo Brolio diktatūra su naujom technologijom kontroliuojamu lageriu, apie kurį pranašavo Orvell. Tačiau žinant kas jau dabar yra daroma ta linkme - tautų fragmentacija per emigracijos skatinimą, naujoji ideologija su Biblijoje neminimomis nuodėmėmis - "homofobija", Hokausto neigimas", "ksenofobija"... ir t.t. "visuomenių transformavimas"... ir t.t... tai nieko gero nesitiki... bet va Sarkozi, su savo drasiais pareiškimais, teikia vilčių. Drąsus šis safardas. Tikiu gerų jėgų pergale.
leftas.info/2010/01/24/tikintieji-apsinuodijo-ismatomis-uzterstu-svestu-vandeniu/
Na kagi........ p. prezidente prarado buri rinkeju ( bent jau as uz Putino kopija nebebalsuosiu )
kur Jus p.D.Kuoly,Ruta Janutiene,Krivickai.kur Jus,nejaugi Jus irgi uztilde.Gelbekit musu vaikus.
Kuolys teisus, Grybauskaitė gali būti ir yra tos sistemos dalis
Ar jau bus kuriamas socializmas pagal Sorošo stilių? Kaip pranašavo dar 1995 m. KGB Pulkininkas Liubimovas, kūręs Perestroikos planą kartu su KGB vadu Andropovu - paleisim laukinį kapitalizmą, kad žmonės patys pasiprašytų socializmo "su žmonišku veidu"??
By Matthew Vadum on
Having purchased, rented, or placed a down payment on all the political influence up for sale in America, leftist troublemaker George Soros now plans to ramp up his war on markets worldwide by creating an "Institute for New Economic Thinking" (INET).
"The system we have now has actually broken down, only we haven't quite recognized it and so you need to create a new one and this is the time to do it," Soros told the Financial Times last month.
In an interview with Der Spiegel last year Soros said European-style socialism "is exactly what we need now. I am against market fundamentalism. I think this propaganda that government involvement is always bad has been very successful -- but also very harmful to our society."
As preparation for INET, which already has a functioning website, Soros gathered economists to plot his renewed drive for world statism. One of those economists is Joseph Stiglitz, a member of the Socialist International. Stiglitz sits on SI's Commission on Global Financial Issues, which was created "to address from a social democratic perspective the ongoing global financial crisis." Of course to socialists a capitalist economy is by definition always in crisis, but that's a discussion for another day.
INET's website quotes socialist Stiglitz saying, "The financial crisis has caused a moment of deep reflection in the economics profession, for it has put many long-standing ideas to the test. If science is defined by its ability to forecast the future, the failure of much of the economics profession to see the crisis coming should be a cause of great concern."
INET is scheduled to be launched at England's Cambridge University in April. The owner of America's Democratic Party, who spent over $20 million to prevent President Bush's reelection in 2004, plans to shell out $50 million for INET over a decade and hopes matching funds will push the total endowment to $200 million.
Liberal writer Ezra Klein notes, "That's a lot of money. It's so much money, in fact, that it's hard to imagine how an economics think tank will use it."
Why Soros feels he's not having enough impact on the world is unclear.
Soros helped finance the Czech Republic's 1989 "Velvet Revolution" that brought Vaclav Havel to power. He acknowledged having orchestrated coups in Croatia, Georgia, Slovakia, and Yugoslavia. He brought the financial systems of the United Kingdom and Malaysia to their knees.
In the U.S., his preferred candidate now lives in the White House, the radical party he adores controls Congress, and interest groups and the bulk of the progressive political infrastructure kneel at his feet.
Through his charity, the Open Society Institute, Soros funds groups such as ACORN that are among the most influential in America.
Since 1999, OSI has given grants to John Podesta's Center for American Progress ($1.8 million), Center on Budget and Policy Priorities ($3.7 million), Economic Policy Institute ($3 million), Institute for America's Future ($965,000), and the Center for Policy Alternatives ($1.4 million). In the same period OSI has given Tides Foundation and Tides Center, which distribute often-anonymous grants to radical and anti-American groups, a staggering $20.8 million.
By Matthew Vadum on
Having purchased, rented, or placed a down payment on all the political influence up for sale in America, leftist troublemaker George Soros now plans to ramp up his war on markets worldwide by creating an "Institute for New Economic Thinking" (INET).
"The system we have now has actually broken down, only we haven't quite recognized it and so you need to create a new one and this is the time to do it," Soros told the Financial Times last month.
In an interview with Der Spiegel last year Soros said European-style socialism "is exactly what we need now. I am against market fundamentalism. I think this propaganda that government involvement is always bad has been very successful -- but also very harmful to our society."
As preparation for INET, which already has a functioning website, Soros gathered economists to plot his renewed drive for world statism. One of those economists is Joseph Stiglitz, a member of the Socialist International. Stiglitz sits on SI's Commission on Global Financial Issues, which was created "to address from a social democratic perspective the ongoing global financial crisis." Of course to socialists a capitalist economy is by definition always in crisis, but that's a discussion for another day.
INET's website quotes socialist Stiglitz saying, "The financial crisis has caused a moment of deep reflection in the economics profession, for it has put many long-standing ideas to the test. If science is defined by its ability to forecast the future, the failure of much of the economics profession to see the crisis coming should be a cause of great concern."
INET is scheduled to be launched at England's Cambridge University in April. The owner of America's Democratic Party, who spent over $20 million to prevent President Bush's reelection in 2004, plans to shell out $50 million for INET over a decade and hopes matching funds will push the total endowment to $200 million.
Liberal writer Ezra Klein notes, "That's a lot of money. It's so much money, in fact, that it's hard to imagine how an economics think tank will use it."
Why Soros feels he's not having enough impact on the world is unclear.
Soros helped finance the Czech Republic's 1989 "Velvet Revolution" that brought Vaclav Havel to power. He acknowledged having orchestrated coups in Croatia, Georgia, Slovakia, and Yugoslavia. He brought the financial systems of the United Kingdom and Malaysia to their knees.
In the U.S., his preferred candidate now lives in the White House, the radical party he adores controls Congress, and interest groups and the bulk of the progressive political infrastructure kneel at his feet.
Through his charity, the Open Society Institute, Soros funds groups such as ACORN that are among the most influential in America.
Since 1999, OSI has given grants to John Podesta's Center for American Progress ($1.8 million), Center on Budget and Policy Priorities ($3.7 million), Economic Policy Institute ($3 million), Institute for America's Future ($965,000), and the Center for Policy Alternatives ($1.4 million). In the same period OSI has given Tides Foundation and Tides Center, which distribute often-anonymous grants to radical and anti-American groups, a staggering $20.8 million.
In 1979 Soros established the Open Society Institute (OSI), which serves as the flagship of a network of Soros foundations that donate tens of millions of dollars each year to a wide array of individuals and organizations that share the founder's agendas. Those agendas can be summarized as follows:
promoting the view that America is institutionally an oppressive nation
promoting the election of leftist political candidates throughout the United States
opposing virtually all post-9/11 national security measures enacted by U.S. government, particularly the Patriot Act
depicting American military actions as unjust, unwarranted, and immoral
promoting open borders, mass immigration, and a watering down of current immigration laws
promoting a dramatic expansion of social welfare programs funded by ever-escalating taxes
promoting social welfare benefits and amnesty for illegal aliens
defending the civil rights and liberties of suspected anti-American terrorists and their abetters
financing the recruitment and training of future activist leaders of the political Left
advocating America's unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending
opposing the death penalty in all circumstances
promoting socialized medicine in the United States
promoting the tenets of radical environmentalism, whose ultimate goal, as writer Michael Berliner has explained, is "not clean air and clean water, [but] rather ... the demolition of technological/industrial civilization"
bringing American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations
promoting racial and ethnic preferences in academia and the business world alike
promoting taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand
advocating stricter gun-control measures
advocating the legalization of marijuana
promoting the view that America is institutionally an oppressive nation
promoting the election of leftist political candidates throughout the United States
opposing virtually all post-9/11 national security measures enacted by U.S. government, particularly the Patriot Act
depicting American military actions as unjust, unwarranted, and immoral
promoting open borders, mass immigration, and a watering down of current immigration laws
promoting a dramatic expansion of social welfare programs funded by ever-escalating taxes
promoting social welfare benefits and amnesty for illegal aliens
defending the civil rights and liberties of suspected anti-American terrorists and their abetters
financing the recruitment and training of future activist leaders of the political Left
advocating America's unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending
opposing the death penalty in all circumstances
promoting socialized medicine in the United States
promoting the tenets of radical environmentalism, whose ultimate goal, as writer Michael Berliner has explained, is "not clean air and clean water, [but] rather ... the demolition of technological/industrial civilization"
bringing American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations
promoting racial and ethnic preferences in academia and the business world alike
promoting taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand
advocating stricter gun-control measures
advocating the legalization of marijuana
as suprantu visa reikala tik taip: tiesiog JE - globoja tokia prokuratura , o tokia prokaratura globoja tokius pedofilus ir visi dirba savo darba .
bet tada tiesiog nereikia nustebti ir piktintis kai kas (simtai, tukstanciai ,desimtys tusktanciu) iseina /iseis i gatves su shakem ar akmenim .
p.s. o kai palygini su prokurorais ir kitais ministrais , tai usackas blogas , labai blogas
bet tada tiesiog nereikia nustebti ir piktintis kai kas (simtai, tukstanciai ,desimtys tusktanciu) iseina /iseis i gatves su shakem ar akmenim .
p.s. o kai palygini su prokurorais ir kitais ministrais , tai usackas blogas , labai blogas
Grybauskaitė - jėga! Medijai nepavyks suformuot neigiamos nuomonės prieš ją
Laikydamasi pozityvios nuostatos: galiu numanyti, kad prezidentė pati išsigando to ką atrado atėjusi į valdžią. "Valstybininkų klaną", visišką ekonominę suirutę ir pasimetimą, ir daugybės pareigūnų neveiklumą ir nesugebėjimą dirbti.
Per trumpą laiką nulėkė daug galvų kitos išeities nebuvo... taigi dabar Valantino atveju dar vieno pareigūno keitimas galėtų sukelti abejonių ar prezidentė neperdaug kategorišką (nors šiuo konkrečiu atveju jos rinkėjų dauguma laukė tokio jo sprendimo)! Taigi tik laikas kada per artimiausius mėnesius šis Valantinas bus atstatydintas.
Laikydamasi atsargesnio ir negatyvesnio požiūrio: galiu imti manyti, kad šiuo atveju arba prezidentę, kaip rašoma apgavo; arba ji yra pati "įklimpusi ar įklampinta" kažkokių šios "teisėsaugos klano" struktūros turimos kompromituojančios medžiagos prieš ją.
Betkuriuo atveju šios bylos rezonansas toks didelis, kad tokiais pigiais metodais jos nuslopinti nepavyks. Taigi prezidentei yra tik 2 alternatyvos: arba skęsti kartu su šiuo Valantinu ir jo parankiniais arba priimti ryžtingą sprendimą ir išvalyti šią sistemą.
Taigi laikas parodys, kokį sprendimą priims prezidentė kol kas dar turinti tautos pasitikėjimą...
Per trumpą laiką nulėkė daug galvų kitos išeities nebuvo... taigi dabar Valantino atveju dar vieno pareigūno keitimas galėtų sukelti abejonių ar prezidentė neperdaug kategorišką (nors šiuo konkrečiu atveju jos rinkėjų dauguma laukė tokio jo sprendimo)! Taigi tik laikas kada per artimiausius mėnesius šis Valantinas bus atstatydintas.
Laikydamasi atsargesnio ir negatyvesnio požiūrio: galiu imti manyti, kad šiuo atveju arba prezidentę, kaip rašoma apgavo; arba ji yra pati "įklimpusi ar įklampinta" kažkokių šios "teisėsaugos klano" struktūros turimos kompromituojančios medžiagos prieš ją.
Betkuriuo atveju šios bylos rezonansas toks didelis, kad tokiais pigiais metodais jos nuslopinti nepavyks. Taigi prezidentei yra tik 2 alternatyvos: arba skęsti kartu su šiuo Valantinu ir jo parankiniais arba priimti ryžtingą sprendimą ir išvalyti šią sistemą.
Taigi laikas parodys, kokį sprendimą priims prezidentė kol kas dar turinti tautos pasitikėjimą...
D.Kuolys: A.Valantiną ir sistemą remianti prezidentė turės pasiaiškinti