(2) "...I could not imagine that American policymakers, and particularly the conservatives in both the Republican and Democratic parties, despite their long experience with Communist treachery, would not be able to grasp the new manoeuvres of the Communist strategists and would rush to commit the West to helping 'perestroika' which is so contrary to their interests.

"It has been sad to observe the jubilation of American and West European conservatives who have been cheering 'perestroika' without realising that it is intended to bring about their own political and physical demise. Liberal support for 'perestroika' is understandable, but conservative support came as a surprise to me." (pg. XIX)

The first main reason for the general (but not in fact complete) rejection of the Author's analysis is that, as the case of Aldrich Hazen Ames has shown, the Russians won the intelligence war through their penetration of Western intelligence services--a message which, naturally, these services do not wish to hear... In the course of his work with the American, British and French services, the Author found that penetration had destroyed their ability to interpret events in the Communist world correctly.

Anatoliy Golitsyn was born in the Ukraine in 1926, served as a member of the KGB in various intelligence, counterintelligence, and counterespionage roles, until he defected to the United States in 1961 of which he is now a citizen. Since that time he has diligently studied Communist and international affairs, reading both the Western and Communist press which has lead him to submit Memoranda to the CIA outlining his analysis of Communist affairs.

Introduction: The book includes a series of memoranda that the author sent to the CIA in recent years. Golitsyn felt that since his "warnings" have basically gone unheeded by the government that he would publish them in a book. He asked the CIA to declassify them, and they agreed. The author cites several reasons for this consideration of presenting his memoranda to the public. I'll quote just two:

(1) "...The democracies of the United States and Western Europe are facing a dangerous situation and are vulnerable because their governments, the Vatican, the elite, the media, the industrialists, the financiers, the trade unions and, most important, the general public are blind to the dangers of the strategy of 'perestroika' ... The democracies could perish unless they are informed about the aggressive design of 'perestroika' against them." (pg. XIX)

O ko dar galima tiketis valstybeje kuria valdo buve sovietiniai nomenklaturininkai ? Sovietiniais laikais KGB visada buvo pagrindinis KPSS represiju instrumentas.

jau nebejuokinga

Be KGB vadovybės Seimas nei iš vietos.

Vice-pirmininku bus vice-kgbistas

Jeigu pirmininkas bus Vyktaras.

Viskas taip grazu kad net juokas neima ponas Valionis buvo ismestas kaip muse is barsciu o dabar prasom i seimo pirmininko pavaduotojus zmones ka jie isdarineja jie tyciojasi is musu.jeigu jau neteko vienu pareigu tai viskas viso gero ir is seimo ir kuo toliau nuo valdzios.kiek galima kenteti ir ziureti i tas nesamones visas pasaulis juokesi .

Išgamos.

"Valstybininkai" suįžūlėjo galutinai. Užvakar - Siaurusevičius, šiandien - Valionis.
Poryt pradės dingti žmonės.