Rašyti komentarą...
Nuoroda nukopijuota
× Pranešti klaidą
Latvia wins the cases Mencena v. Latvia and Kuhareca v. Latvia at the European Court of Human Rights.
The Court Chamber, composed of 7 judges, ruled unanimously that the complaints filed by the applicants concerning the alleged violation of Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (right to respect for private and family life) in both cases must be rejected as inadmissible for further examination on the merits.
The Court emphasized that the state language is one of the basic constitutional values, as is a country's territory, structure, and flag. Thus, a country that declares a specific language to be the official language, undertakes to guarantee its citizens the right to use it without intervention not only in their private life but also in communication with public authorities when sending or receiving information in that language.
The Court indicated that upon spelling surnames "Mentzen" and "Кухарец" according to peculiarities of the grammar of the Latvian language, they had been subject to minimum changes. The use of the Latvianized surnames (Mencena, Kuhareca) has not prevented the applicants from exercise all political, economic and social rights, including the right to leave Latvia and to return to the country. In the case of "Mencena", the Court pointed out in addition that the applicant had never been denied entry or stay in foreign countries.
The Court Chamber, composed of 7 judges, ruled unanimously that the complaints filed by the applicants concerning the alleged violation of Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (right to respect for private and family life) in both cases must be rejected as inadmissible for further examination on the merits.
The Court emphasized that the state language is one of the basic constitutional values, as is a country's territory, structure, and flag. Thus, a country that declares a specific language to be the official language, undertakes to guarantee its citizens the right to use it without intervention not only in their private life but also in communication with public authorities when sending or receiving information in that language.
The Court indicated that upon spelling surnames "Mentzen" and "Кухарец" according to peculiarities of the grammar of the Latvian language, they had been subject to minimum changes. The use of the Latvianized surnames (Mencena, Kuhareca) has not prevented the applicants from exercise all political, economic and social rights, including the right to leave Latvia and to return to the country. In the case of "Mencena", the Court pointed out in addition that the applicant had never been denied entry or stay in foreign countries.
In your face lenkai! Nesikelkit, nes jums lubos labai zemai.
prie ko cia tie lenkai?? ka su lietuviais maza problemu? tegul varo lauk is lietuvos sudziai
o kada Lietuvos lenkpalaikiai ims gerbti sali kurioje jie gyvena ir elgtis kaip pilieciai o ne tautos priesai?
Kodėl negalima padaryti taip, kaip Latvijoje? Rašoma transkribuota pavardė latviškai, kad kiekvienas latvis ją perskaitytų pagal normalų skambesį, o skliausteliuose šalia - originalo kalba ir raštu - nors ir bangladešietiškai. Viskas. Problemos pabaiga.
ir vel tos mutli kulti problemos. Tai lenkai savo pavardziu lietuviskais rasmenimis neperskaito, tai neperskaito lietuviskai uzrasytu dalyku Vilniau kraste... Ir su lietuviais - atvirksciai...
Geriau jau politikai palitktu tuos gyventojus ir leistu gyventi kaip jie nori. jeigu lenkai myli polska - tegul vaziuoja i polska. Jeigu lietuviai myli lietuva - tegul vaziuoja i lietuva. Kas cia neaisku?
Geriau jau politikai palitktu tuos gyventojus ir leistu gyventi kaip jie nori. jeigu lenkai myli polska - tegul vaziuoja i polska. Jeigu lietuviai myli lietuva - tegul vaziuoja i lietuva. Kas cia neaisku?
Lenkijos atstovas pripažino Lietuvos priekaištus