Rašyti komentarą...
Nuoroda nukopijuota
× Pranešti klaidą
Tvarkos.
Na komunistai TSRS laiku, ir kaltinami tuo, kad neleido vogti ir žulikauti . Todėl, paleidus tą bandą į laisvę, prasidėjo dabartinis bardakas. Panašiai kaip paleidus kalinius į laisvę, jie kaltina buvusius prižiūrėtojus, kad neišmokė savarankiškai gyventi. Išvadą galima daryti tik tokią: jeigu Lietuvos valdžia negali pati susilaikyti nuo vogimo, reikėtų vėl komunistų priežiūros.
TSRS laike lietuvių tauta buvo Lietuvoje padidėjusi beveik iki 4 mln.Pripažinkim - melžėm Rasieją,todėl mus iš ten ir išmetė. Tada Lietuvoje valdžią paėmė žulikai,po ko milijonui lietuviui neliko galimybių išgyventi Lietuvoje ir jie iš čia išnyko. Žulikai,vietoj to,kad prisipažintų esantys kalti ir padėtų galvas ant kaladės po budelio kirviu,bando savo kaltes primesti komunistams,kurių nebėra Lietuvoje nuo 1990m. ir prie kurių,kaip minėjau,TSRS lietuvių tauta augo.TODĖL VISUS,KURIE KALTAIS ĮVARDIJA KOMUNISTUS,DERA SODINTI IR KUO GREIČIAU.
Komentatoriai " Seniai laikas","DJ KUlkosvaidis","Savanoris" yra žydšaudčių - pokario banditų liekanos.Tokius nedamuštas kontras dera pasodinti ir kuo greičiau - jie tik banditizmą propaguoja.
tik daug šneka ir nieko nedaro... Bet reikia tikėti , kad padarys , o tada visokie komentatoriai kaip "tikras lietuvis" bus užlaužti :)
Būtina steigti ir teisti komunistus.Sudarinėkime komunistų ir neokomunistų sąrašus, fiksuokime visus jų blogus darbus. Numatykime vietas jų galimam laikinam lailymui iki pilno klausimo sprendimo. Kiekvienoje apskrityje būtina numatyti nors po vieną stovyklą jiems laikyti. Tiktų apleistos sovietų bazės...ir dabar valdžioje visokie eks ir neo komunistai- Juršėnas, kirkilas ir kiti. Galvojat jie pasikeitė? Apie juos kalba jų juodi dabartiniai darbai...
Jau senai reikėjo tai padaryti.
Komunizmo nebuvo. Komunizmo ideologijos nėra. Ką jie žada teisti,tie glušpetriai ? Savo durnumą.
raudonajam fašizmui ir raudoniesiems naciams už tautų genocidą tikrai bus.
Politically, globalization represents the leveraging of power beyond that found in any one nation. Using the clichés of global governance, we would call this a “new world civilization,” one that’s built with international management in mind. Mikhail Gorbachev, the last true master of the Soviet style of centralized power explains,
“The time has come to develop integrated global policies.” [3]
But political globalization is not an overnight game. We don’t stop work Friday afternoon, take a break over the weekend, and poof, find ourselves on Monday morning immersed in global governance. Rather, this macro-political transformation is the product of generations of changes, bumps and corrections, and decades of decisive planning.
Already in 1945, leading socialist Scott Nearing penned,
“A world society cannot be haphazard. Since there are no precedents, it cannot be traditional at this stage in its development. It can only be deliberative and experimental, planned and built up with particular objectives…” [4]
Much more recently, Trilateral Commission co-founder Zbigniew Brzezinski espoused similar notions, albeit with an American-focused bent. In his book, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives, the former National Security Advisor maintains that America’s purpose for global engagement is “that of forging an enduring framework of global geopolitical cooperation” and to “unapologetically” position itself as the arbitrator of “global management.” [5]
Capping off this assertion, Brzezinski closes with these sobering words,
“Geostrategic success in that cause would represent a fitting legacy of America’s role as the first, only, and last truly global superpower.” [6]
Jim Garrison, founder and President of the Gorbachev Foundation/USA (at the behest of Mikhail Gorbachev), [7] likewise sees America as the forging element in globalization.
“…America must consciously view itself as a transitional empire, one whose destiny at this moment is to act as midwife to a democratically governed global system. Its great challenge is not to dominate but to catalyze. It must use its great strength and democratic heritage to establish integrating institutions and mechanisms to manage the emerging global system so that its own power is subsumed by the very edifice it helps to build.
“The time has come to develop integrated global policies.” [3]
But political globalization is not an overnight game. We don’t stop work Friday afternoon, take a break over the weekend, and poof, find ourselves on Monday morning immersed in global governance. Rather, this macro-political transformation is the product of generations of changes, bumps and corrections, and decades of decisive planning.
Already in 1945, leading socialist Scott Nearing penned,
“A world society cannot be haphazard. Since there are no precedents, it cannot be traditional at this stage in its development. It can only be deliberative and experimental, planned and built up with particular objectives…” [4]
Much more recently, Trilateral Commission co-founder Zbigniew Brzezinski espoused similar notions, albeit with an American-focused bent. In his book, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives, the former National Security Advisor maintains that America’s purpose for global engagement is “that of forging an enduring framework of global geopolitical cooperation” and to “unapologetically” position itself as the arbitrator of “global management.” [5]
Capping off this assertion, Brzezinski closes with these sobering words,
“Geostrategic success in that cause would represent a fitting legacy of America’s role as the first, only, and last truly global superpower.” [6]
Jim Garrison, founder and President of the Gorbachev Foundation/USA (at the behest of Mikhail Gorbachev), [7] likewise sees America as the forging element in globalization.
“…America must consciously view itself as a transitional empire, one whose destiny at this moment is to act as midwife to a democratically governed global system. Its great challenge is not to dominate but to catalyze. It must use its great strength and democratic heritage to establish integrating institutions and mechanisms to manage the emerging global system so that its own power is subsumed by the very edifice it helps to build.
Ukrainoje - siūlymas steigti tarptautinį tribunolą komunizmui